Logo

Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?

Last Updated: 28.06.2025 23:49

Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?

Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.

Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.

Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?

When did washing a dog exhaust you very quickly?

Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.

Any day of the week — including Sundays.

Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.

'No Kings' protests against Trump planned nationwide to coincide with military parade - NPR

Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.

Russia can stop this any time.

Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.

According to Trump, Ukraine started the war. Why?

Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.

Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.

Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.

Rem dolor autem consequatur assumenda magnam.

Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.

All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.

Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.

As a Chinese, what disgusts you about the Chinese society today?

Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.

What’s next?

Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?

When Don Nelson collects Chuck Daly Lifetime Achievement Award, he’ll throw shade at Doncic trade - San Francisco Chronicle

Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.

“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.

Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?

The fate of the EV tax credits depends on the GOP’s megabill - NPR

Just in the last 5 years:

Thank you.

Sending ATACMS is WW3.

Scoop: Every Senate Dem demands Trump withdraw military from Los Angeles - Axios

Let’s just make it real clear:

Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.

Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.

What is your response when someone says "how may I help you"?